man/build: Fix dependency handling

build_man is a 'feature' option, which means that we get an opaque
object, so comparing it to 'yes' is always false.

It should have been 'if build_man.enabled()'.

But going even further we can prune the whole check, as rst2man is
defined as follows:

rst2man = find_program('rst2man-3', 'rst2man', required : build_man)

>From the patch overhauling those options:

    get_option() on a feature returns opaque object that can be passed as
    a 'required' argument of a dependency. Auto is equivalent to 'required
    : false', enabled is equivalent to 'required : true' and disabled
    introduces new behavior forcing the dependency to be considered not
    found.

This would cause the build to fail if build_man is enabled (aka
'required') and rst2man is not found. So...

if rst2man.found()
  # rst2man found
  # buildu buildu
else
  # rst2man not found, but considered optional because
  # we haven't erred out on find_program
  if build_man.enabled() # cannot be, it's optional!
    error('...')
  endif
endif

We can get rid of the whole else block here.

Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Ser <simon.ser@intel.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/man/meson.build b/man/meson.build
index 0f0a6dd4..2c1396af 100644
--- a/man/meson.build
+++ b/man/meson.build
@@ -38,10 +38,6 @@ if rst2man.found()
 				install : true,
 				install_dir : join_paths(mandir, 'man1'))
 	endforeach
-	build_info += 'Build man pages: true'
-else
-	if build_man == 'yes'
-		error('Cannot build man pages due to missing dependencies')
-	endif
-	build_info += 'Build man pages: false'
 endif
+
+build_info += 'Build man pages: @0@'.format(rst2man.found())