From 982f7eb238a0898c456e0574dee7c4507738d75f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:19:57 +0100 Subject: Prepare for 64bit relocation addresses This reveal that quite a few locations were writing relocation offsets but only allowing for 32 bit addresses. To reveal such places in active tests, we also now double check that we do not use more batch space than declared. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large_map.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large_map.c') diff --git a/benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large_map.c b/benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large_map.c index 18d2dfe4..771cb3cd 100644 --- a/benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large_map.c +++ b/benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large_map.c @@ -105,11 +105,9 @@ do_render(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, struct intel_batchbuffer *batch, OUT_BATCH(0); /* dst x1,y1 */ OUT_BATCH((height << 16) | width); /* dst x2,y2 */ OUT_RELOC(dst_bo, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER, 0); - BLIT_RELOC_UDW(batch->devid); OUT_BATCH(0); /* src x1,y1 */ OUT_BATCH(width * 4); /* src pitch */ OUT_RELOC(src_bo, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER, 0, 0); - BLIT_RELOC_UDW(batch->devid); ADVANCE_BATCH(); intel_batchbuffer_flush(batch); -- cgit v1.2.3