| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Plus naming convention for runtime pm tests to have "rpm" somewhere in
their tests. Note that all the pc8-specific tests (for e.g. residency
or similar) already have pc8 in their subtest names, so we don't lose
any information here.
Cc: "Yang, Guang A" <guang.a.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Oops. We should be a bit more consistent with which verb form we're
picking. tile,tiled,tiling is even worse ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Inspired by the recent pile of tests for the CS, which doesn't split
up the tests into per-ring subtests.
Cc: bradley.d.volkin@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Imo power management, power consumption and performance are tightly
enough coupled that we can throw them all into one bin.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
Just a start and we need more work here. Some follow-up patches will
clear up some of the historical confusion.
While at it rename the pc8 "basic" test to "rte".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
