From cb5a35fe8ebe959291082a15395a619b40c562a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Anholt Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:17:12 -0700 Subject: Add a couple of other intel_upload_blit_large variants for comparison. --- benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large.c') diff --git a/benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large.c b/benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large.c index aec19c44..b3581d43 100644 --- a/benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large.c +++ b/benchmarks/intel_upload_blit_large.c @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ * Additionally, those applications should be rendering at the screen refresh * rate, while this test has no limits, and so can get itself into the * working set larger than aperture size performance disaster. + * + * The current workload doing this path is pixmap upload for non-KMS. */ #include -- cgit v1.2.3