summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kvm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJiří Paleček <jpalecek@web.de>2019-06-22 19:42:04 +0200
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2019-09-11 18:02:25 +0200
commit1cfff4d9a5d01fa61e5768a6afffc81ae1c8ecb9 (patch)
treead001f9f8d93352135c5ff979ce09cd9db301dbc /arch/x86/kvm
parentc8848cee74ff05638e913582a476bde879c968ad (diff)
kvm: Nested KVM MMUs need PAE root too
On AMD processors, in PAE 32bit mode, nested KVM instances don't work. The L0 host get a kernel OOPS, which is related to arch.mmu->pae_root being NULL. The reason for this is that when setting up nested KVM instance, arch.mmu is set to &arch.guest_mmu (while normally, it would be &arch.root_mmu). However, the initialization and allocation of pae_root only creates it in root_mmu. KVM code (ie. in mmu_alloc_shadow_roots) then accesses arch.mmu->pae_root, which is the unallocated arch.guest_mmu->pae_root. This fix just allocates (and frees) pae_root in both guest_mmu and root_mmu (and also lm_root if it was allocated). The allocation is subject to previous restrictions ie. it won't allocate anything on 64-bit and AFAIK not on Intel. Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203923 Fixes: 14c07ad89f4d ("x86/kvm/mmu: introduce guest_mmu") Signed-off-by: Jiri Palecek <jpalecek@web.de> Tested-by: Jiri Palecek <jpalecek@web.de> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c30
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 4c45ff0cfbd0..9086ee4b64cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -5595,13 +5595,13 @@ slot_handle_leaf(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL, lock_flush_tlb);
}
-static void free_mmu_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void free_mmu_pages(struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
{
- free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.mmu->pae_root);
- free_page((unsigned long)vcpu->arch.mmu->lm_root);
+ free_page((unsigned long)mmu->pae_root);
+ free_page((unsigned long)mmu->lm_root);
}
-static int alloc_mmu_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int alloc_mmu_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
{
struct page *page;
int i;
@@ -5622,9 +5622,9 @@ static int alloc_mmu_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!page)
return -ENOMEM;
- vcpu->arch.mmu->pae_root = page_address(page);
+ mmu->pae_root = page_address(page);
for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
- vcpu->arch.mmu->pae_root[i] = INVALID_PAGE;
+ mmu->pae_root[i] = INVALID_PAGE;
return 0;
}
@@ -5632,6 +5632,7 @@ static int alloc_mmu_pages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
uint i;
+ int ret;
vcpu->arch.mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
vcpu->arch.walk_mmu = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
@@ -5649,7 +5650,19 @@ int kvm_mmu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.guest_mmu.prev_roots[i] = KVM_MMU_ROOT_INFO_INVALID;
vcpu->arch.nested_mmu.translate_gpa = translate_nested_gpa;
- return alloc_mmu_pages(vcpu);
+
+ ret = alloc_mmu_pages(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.guest_mmu);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = alloc_mmu_pages(vcpu, &vcpu->arch.root_mmu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail_allocate_root;
+
+ return ret;
+ fail_allocate_root:
+ free_mmu_pages(&vcpu->arch.guest_mmu);
+ return ret;
}
static void kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_pages_in_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -6074,7 +6087,8 @@ unsigned long kvm_mmu_calculate_default_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
void kvm_mmu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
kvm_mmu_unload(vcpu);
- free_mmu_pages(vcpu);
+ free_mmu_pages(&vcpu->arch.root_mmu);
+ free_mmu_pages(&vcpu->arch.guest_mmu);
mmu_free_memory_caches(vcpu);
}