diff options
author | Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> | 2022-08-26 15:31:32 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2022-08-30 15:32:04 +0200 |
commit | 9c6d778800b921bde3bff3cff5003d1650f942d1 (patch) | |
tree | 38b9583ff31770b6807ece608b7c7071a3f3c599 /drivers/usb/core | |
parent | 1016fc0c096c92dd0e6e0541daac7a7868169903 (diff) |
USB: core: Prevent nested device-reset calls
Automatic kernel fuzzing revealed a recursive locking violation in
usb-storage:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.18.0 #3 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/1:3/1205 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888018638db8 (&us_interface_key[i]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
usb_stor_pre_reset+0x35/0x40 drivers/usb/storage/usb.c:230
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888018638db8 (&us_interface_key[i]){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
usb_stor_pre_reset+0x35/0x40 drivers/usb/storage/usb.c:230
...
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1205 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 5.18.0 #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2988 [inline]
check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3031 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3816 [inline]
__lock_acquire.cold+0x152/0x3ca kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5665 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5630
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x14f/0x1610 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
usb_stor_pre_reset+0x35/0x40 drivers/usb/storage/usb.c:230
usb_reset_device+0x37d/0x9a0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:6109
r871xu_dev_remove+0x21a/0x270 drivers/staging/rtl8712/usb_intf.c:622
usb_unbind_interface+0x1bd/0x890 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:458
device_remove drivers/base/dd.c:545 [inline]
device_remove+0x11f/0x170 drivers/base/dd.c:537
__device_release_driver drivers/base/dd.c:1222 [inline]
device_release_driver_internal+0x1a7/0x2f0 drivers/base/dd.c:1248
usb_driver_release_interface+0x102/0x180 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:627
usb_forced_unbind_intf+0x4d/0xa0 drivers/usb/core/driver.c:1118
usb_reset_device+0x39b/0x9a0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:6114
This turned out not to be an error in usb-storage but rather a nested
device reset attempt. That is, as the rtl8712 driver was being
unbound from a composite device in preparation for an unrelated USB
reset (that driver does not have pre_reset or post_reset callbacks),
its ->remove routine called usb_reset_device() -- thus nesting one
reset call within another.
Performing a reset as part of disconnect processing is a questionable
practice at best. However, the bug report points out that the USB
core does not have any protection against nested resets. Adding a
reset_in_progress flag and testing it will prevent such errors in the
future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAB7eexKUpvX-JNiLzhXBDWgfg2T9e9_0Tw4HQ6keN==voRbP0g@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: Rondreis <linhaoguo86@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YwkflDxvg0KWqyZK@rowland.harvard.edu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/usb/core')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c index 2633acde7ac1..d4b1e70d1498 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c @@ -6038,6 +6038,11 @@ re_enumerate: * the reset is over (using their post_reset method). * * Return: The same as for usb_reset_and_verify_device(). + * However, if a reset is already in progress (for instance, if a + * driver doesn't have pre_ or post_reset() callbacks, and while + * being unbound or re-bound during the ongoing reset its disconnect() + * or probe() routine tries to perform a second, nested reset), the + * routine returns -EINPROGRESS. * * Note: * The caller must own the device lock. For example, it's safe to use @@ -6071,6 +6076,10 @@ int usb_reset_device(struct usb_device *udev) return -EISDIR; } + if (udev->reset_in_progress) + return -EINPROGRESS; + udev->reset_in_progress = 1; + port_dev = hub->ports[udev->portnum - 1]; /* @@ -6135,6 +6144,7 @@ int usb_reset_device(struct usb_device *udev) usb_autosuspend_device(udev); memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag); + udev->reset_in_progress = 0; return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_reset_device); |