diff options
| author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2014-01-20 19:20:06 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2014-02-09 21:18:54 +0100 |
| commit | fb9edbe98493fcd9df66de926ae9157cbe0e4dcd (patch) | |
| tree | 9fc6c5acfcd5c99bd9cf13a177ea3fd0b794cb3f /kernel | |
| parent | ddf1d169c0a489d498c1799a7043904a43b0c159 (diff) | |
lockdep: Make held_lock->check and "int check" argument bool
The "int check" argument of lock_acquire() and held_lock->check are
misleading. This is actually a boolean: 2 means "true", everything
else is "false".
And there is no need to pass 1 or 0 to lock_acquire() depending on
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, __lock_acquire() checks prove_locking at the
start and clears "check" if !CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING.
Note: probably we can simply kill this member/arg. The only explicit
user of check => 0 is rcu_lock_acquire(), perhaps we can change it to
use lock_acquire(trylock =>, read => 2). __lockdep_no_validate means
check => 0 implicitly, but we can change validate_chain() to check
hlock->instance->key instead. Not to mention it would be nice to get
rid of lockdep_set_novalidate_class().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140120182006.GA26495@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index eb8a54783fa0..8c85a0da5a38 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock, * (If lookup_chain_cache() returns with 1 it acquires * graph_lock for us) */ - if (!hlock->trylock && (hlock->check == 2) && + if (!hlock->trylock && hlock->check && lookup_chain_cache(curr, hlock, chain_key)) { /* * Check whether last held lock: @@ -3055,9 +3055,6 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int class_idx; u64 chain_key; - if (!prove_locking) - check = 1; - if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) return 0; @@ -3069,8 +3066,8 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return 0; - if (lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__) - check = 1; + if (!prove_locking || lock->key == &__lockdep_no_validate__) + check = 0; if (subclass < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES) class = lock->class_cache[subclass]; @@ -3138,7 +3135,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, hlock->holdtime_stamp = lockstat_clock(); #endif - if (check == 2 && !mark_irqflags(curr, hlock)) + if (check && !mark_irqflags(curr, hlock)) return 0; /* mark it as used: */ |