diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2020-03-19 18:09:37 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> | 2020-03-30 12:37:29 -0700 |
commit | 9106137c6f0d0d959a855ad6885c6b3cb010ff98 (patch) | |
tree | a8873aefe063d3a7ce005ca7e7522885ff8de4f1 /security/keys/keyring.c | |
parent | 1e361632da12ac00cb86c25a857ba251fdf2de95 (diff) |
libnvdimm/region: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319230937.GA16648@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/keys/keyring.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions