From 72c04902d1e27c8a324014cff1d4475c11b1cecd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:58:48 -0400
Subject: Get "no acls for this inode" right, fix shmem breakage
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
(limited to 'fs/btrfs')
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 78ad38ddd01f..dbe1aabf96cd 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2122,10 +2122,8 @@ static void btrfs_read_locked_inode(struct inode *inode)
* any xattrs or acls
*/
maybe_acls = acls_after_inode_item(leaf, path->slots[0], inode->i_ino);
- if (!maybe_acls) {
- inode->i_acl = NULL;
- inode->i_default_acl = NULL;
- }
+ if (!maybe_acls)
+ cache_no_acl(inode);
BTRFS_I(inode)->block_group = btrfs_find_block_group(root, 0,
alloc_group_block, 0);
--
cgit v1.2.3