From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100
Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/types.h | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'include/linux/types.h')

diff --git a/include/linux/types.h b/include/linux/types.h
index d501ad3ba247..1e7bd24848fc 100644
--- a/include/linux/types.h
+++ b/include/linux/types.h
@@ -228,8 +228,5 @@ struct callback_head {
 typedef void (*rcu_callback_t)(struct rcu_head *head);
 typedef void (*call_rcu_func_t)(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
 
-/* clocksource cycle base type */
-typedef u64 cycle_t;
-
 #endif /*  __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif /* _LINUX_TYPES_H */
-- 
cgit v1.2.3