i387: don't ever touch TS_USEDFPU directly, use helper functions

This creates three helper functions that do the TS_USEDFPU accesses, and
makes everybody that used to do it by hand use those helpers instead.

In addition, there's a couple of helper functions for the "change both
CR0.TS and TS_USEDFPU at the same time" case, and the places that do
that together have been changed to use those.  That means that we have
fewer random places that open-code this situation.

The intent is partly to clarify the code without actually changing any
semantics yet (since we clearly still have some hard to reproduce bug in
this area), but also to make it much easier to use another approach
entirely to caching the CR0.TS bit for software accesses.

Right now we use a bit in the thread-info 'status' variable (this patch
does not change that), but we might want to make it a full field of its
own or even make it a per-cpu variable.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 55 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
index 1e12c2d087e..548b2c07ac9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i387.h
@@ -280,6 +280,47 @@ static inline int restore_fpu_checking(struct task_struct *tsk)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Software FPU state helpers. Careful: these need to
+ * be preemption protection *and* they need to be
+ * properly paired with the CR0.TS changes!
+ */
+static inline int __thread_has_fpu(struct thread_info *ti)
+{
+	return ti->status & TS_USEDFPU;
+}
+
+/* Must be paired with an 'stts' after! */
+static inline void __thread_clear_has_fpu(struct thread_info *ti)
+{
+	ti->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
+}
+
+/* Must be paired with a 'clts' before! */
+static inline void __thread_set_has_fpu(struct thread_info *ti)
+{
+	ti->status |= TS_USEDFPU;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Encapsulate the CR0.TS handling together with the
+ * software flag.
+ *
+ * These generally need preemption protection to work,
+ * do try to avoid using these on their own.
+ */
+static inline void __thread_fpu_end(struct thread_info *ti)
+{
+	__thread_clear_has_fpu(ti);
+	stts();
+}
+
+static inline void __thread_fpu_begin(struct thread_info *ti)
+{
+	clts();
+	__thread_set_has_fpu(ti);
+}
+
+/*
  * Signal frame handlers...
  */
 extern int save_i387_xstate(void __user *buf);
@@ -287,23 +328,21 @@ extern int restore_i387_xstate(void __user *buf);
 
 static inline void __unlazy_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) {
+	if (__thread_has_fpu(task_thread_info(tsk))) {
 		__save_init_fpu(tsk);
-		task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
-		stts();
+		__thread_fpu_end(task_thread_info(tsk));
 	} else
 		tsk->fpu_counter = 0;
 }
 
 static inline void __clear_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) {
+	if (__thread_has_fpu(task_thread_info(tsk))) {
 		/* Ignore delayed exceptions from user space */
 		asm volatile("1: fwait\n"
 			     "2:\n"
 			     _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b));
-		task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
-		stts();
+		__thread_fpu_end(task_thread_info(tsk));
 	}
 }
 
@@ -311,14 +350,14 @@ static inline void __clear_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
  * Were we in an interrupt that interrupted kernel mode?
  *
  * We can do a kernel_fpu_begin/end() pair *ONLY* if that
- * pair does nothing at all: TS_USEDFPU must be clear (so
+ * pair does nothing at all: the thread must not have fpu (so
  * that we don't try to save the FPU state), and TS must
  * be set (so that the clts/stts pair does nothing that is
  * visible in the interrupted kernel thread).
  */
 static inline bool interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(void)
 {
-	return !(current_thread_info()->status & TS_USEDFPU) &&
+	return !__thread_has_fpu(current_thread_info()) &&
 		(read_cr0() & X86_CR0_TS);
 }
 
@@ -356,9 +395,9 @@ static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void)
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable());
 	preempt_disable();
-	if (me->status & TS_USEDFPU) {
+	if (__thread_has_fpu(me)) {
 		__save_init_fpu(me->task);
-		me->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
+		__thread_clear_has_fpu(me);
 		/* We do 'stts()' in kernel_fpu_end() */
 	} else
 		clts();
@@ -422,24 +461,21 @@ static inline void irq_ts_restore(int TS_state)
  */
 static inline int user_has_fpu(void)
 {
-	return current_thread_info()->status & TS_USEDFPU;
+	return __thread_has_fpu(current_thread_info());
 }
 
 static inline void user_fpu_end(void)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
-	current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
-	stts();
+	__thread_fpu_end(current_thread_info());
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static inline void user_fpu_begin(void)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
-	if (!user_has_fpu()) {
-		clts();
-		current_thread_info()->status |= TS_USEDFPU;
-	}
+	if (!user_has_fpu())
+		__thread_fpu_begin(current_thread_info());
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
@@ -448,11 +484,10 @@ static inline void user_fpu_begin(void)
  */
 static inline void save_init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU));
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!__thread_has_fpu(task_thread_info(tsk)));
 	preempt_disable();
 	__save_init_fpu(tsk);
-	task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
-	stts();
+	__thread_fpu_end(task_thread_info(tsk));
 	preempt_enable();
 }