summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/afs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>2010-10-26 14:21:26 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2010-10-26 16:52:05 -0700
commit1b430beee5e388605dfb092b214ef0320f752cf6 (patch)
treec1b1ece282aab771fd1386a3fe0c6e82cb5c5bfe /fs/afs
parentd19d5476f4b9f91d2de92b91588bb118beba6c0d (diff)
writeback: remove nonblocking/encountered_congestion references
This removes more dead code that was somehow missed by commit 0d99519efef (writeback: remove unused nonblocking and congestion checks). There are no behavior change except for the removal of two entries from one of the ext4 tracing interface. The nonblocking checks in ->writepages are no longer used because the flusher now prefer to block on get_request_wait() than to skip inodes on IO congestion. The latter will lead to more seeky IO. The nonblocking checks in ->writepage are no longer used because it's redundant with the WB_SYNC_NONE check. We no long set ->nonblocking in VM page out and page migration, because a) it's effectively redundant with WB_SYNC_NONE in current code b) it's old semantic of "Don't get stuck on request queues" is mis-behavior: that would skip some dirty inodes on congestion and page out others, which is unfair in terms of LRU age. Inspired by Christoph Hellwig. Thanks! Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/afs')
-rw-r--r--fs/afs/write.c19
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/fs/afs/write.c b/fs/afs/write.c
index 722743b152d..15690bb1d3b 100644
--- a/fs/afs/write.c
+++ b/fs/afs/write.c
@@ -438,7 +438,6 @@ no_more:
*/
int afs_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
- struct backing_dev_info *bdi = page->mapping->backing_dev_info;
struct afs_writeback *wb;
int ret;
@@ -455,8 +454,6 @@ int afs_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
}
wbc->nr_to_write -= ret;
- if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi))
- wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
_leave(" = 0");
return 0;
@@ -469,7 +466,6 @@ static int afs_writepages_region(struct address_space *mapping,
struct writeback_control *wbc,
pgoff_t index, pgoff_t end, pgoff_t *_next)
{
- struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
struct afs_writeback *wb;
struct page *page;
int ret, n;
@@ -529,11 +525,6 @@ static int afs_writepages_region(struct address_space *mapping,
wbc->nr_to_write -= ret;
- if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
- wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
- break;
- }
-
cond_resched();
} while (index < end && wbc->nr_to_write > 0);
@@ -548,24 +539,16 @@ static int afs_writepages_region(struct address_space *mapping,
int afs_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
- struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
pgoff_t start, end, next;
int ret;
_enter("");
- if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
- wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
- _leave(" = 0 [congest]");
- return 0;
- }
-
if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
start = mapping->writeback_index;
end = -1;
ret = afs_writepages_region(mapping, wbc, start, end, &next);
- if (start > 0 && wbc->nr_to_write > 0 && ret == 0 &&
- !(wbc->nonblocking && wbc->encountered_congestion))
+ if (start > 0 && wbc->nr_to_write > 0 && ret == 0)
ret = afs_writepages_region(mapping, wbc, 0, start,
&next);
mapping->writeback_index = next;