diff options
author | Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> | 2010-01-12 17:39:16 +1100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2010-01-12 21:02:00 -0800 |
commit | 2c761270d5520dd84ab0b4e47c24d99ff8503c38 (patch) | |
tree | c23a51fdcc96641661b632d3b3c2c46ad7e53a91 /lib | |
parent | dbf004d7883b3adb058c0c1a5635bc4ec27651c0 (diff) |
lib: Introduce generic list_sort function
There are two copies of list_sort() in the tree already, one in the DRM
code, another in ubifs. Now XFS needs this as well. Create a generic
list_sort() function from the ubifs version and convert existing users
to it so we don't end up with yet another copy in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Makefile | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/list_sort.c | 102 |
2 files changed, 103 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index 911b25aed1e..3b0b4a696db 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ lib-y += kobject.o kref.o klist.o obj-y += bcd.o div64.o sort.o parser.o halfmd4.o debug_locks.o random32.o \ bust_spinlocks.o hexdump.o kasprintf.o bitmap.o scatterlist.o \ - string_helpers.o gcd.o + string_helpers.o gcd.o list_sort.o ifeq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT),y) CFLAGS_kobject.o += -DDEBUG diff --git a/lib/list_sort.c b/lib/list_sort.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..19d11e0bb95 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/list_sort.c @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/list_sort.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/list.h> + +/** + * list_sort - sort a list. + * @priv: private data, passed to @cmp + * @head: the list to sort + * @cmp: the elements comparison function + * + * This function has been implemented by Mark J Roberts <mjr@znex.org>. It + * implements "merge sort" which has O(nlog(n)) complexity. The list is sorted + * in ascending order. + * + * The comparison function @cmp is supposed to return a negative value if @a is + * less than @b, and a positive value if @a is greater than @b. If @a and @b + * are equivalent, then it does not matter what this function returns. + */ +void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head, + int (*cmp)(void *priv, struct list_head *a, + struct list_head *b)) +{ + struct list_head *p, *q, *e, *list, *tail, *oldhead; + int insize, nmerges, psize, qsize, i; + + if (list_empty(head)) + return; + + list = head->next; + list_del(head); + insize = 1; + for (;;) { + p = oldhead = list; + list = tail = NULL; + nmerges = 0; + + while (p) { + nmerges++; + q = p; + psize = 0; + for (i = 0; i < insize; i++) { + psize++; + q = q->next == oldhead ? NULL : q->next; + if (!q) + break; + } + + qsize = insize; + while (psize > 0 || (qsize > 0 && q)) { + if (!psize) { + e = q; + q = q->next; + qsize--; + if (q == oldhead) + q = NULL; + } else if (!qsize || !q) { + e = p; + p = p->next; + psize--; + if (p == oldhead) + p = NULL; + } else if (cmp(priv, p, q) <= 0) { + e = p; + p = p->next; + psize--; + if (p == oldhead) + p = NULL; + } else { + e = q; + q = q->next; + qsize--; + if (q == oldhead) + q = NULL; + } + if (tail) + tail->next = e; + else + list = e; + e->prev = tail; + tail = e; + } + p = q; + } + + tail->next = list; + list->prev = tail; + + if (nmerges <= 1) + break; + + insize *= 2; + } + + head->next = list; + head->prev = list->prev; + list->prev->next = head; + list->prev = head; +} + +EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_sort); |