diff options
author | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> | 2009-04-02 16:57:38 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-04-02 19:04:55 -0700 |
commit | 0b7f569e45bb6be142d87017030669a6a7d327a1 (patch) | |
tree | 8df7877b95c093ebf4cb4e1006cea16f75fc79b7 /mm/memcontrol.c | |
parent | 81d39c20f5ee2437d71709beb82597e2a38efbbc (diff) |
memcg: fix OOM killer under memcg
This patch tries to fix OOM Killer problems caused by hierarchy.
Now, memcg itself has OOM KILL function (in oom_kill.c) and tries to
kill a task in memcg.
But, when hierarchy is used, it's broken and correct task cannot
be killed. For example, in following cgroup
/groupA/ hierarchy=1, limit=1G,
01 nolimit
02 nolimit
All tasks' memory usage under /groupA, /groupA/01, groupA/02 is limited to
groupA's 1Gbytes but OOM Killer just kills tasks in groupA.
This patch provides makes the bad process be selected from all tasks
under hierarchy. BTW, currently, oom_jiffies is updated against groupA
in above case. oom_jiffies of tree should be updated.
To see how oom_jiffies is used, please check mem_cgroup_oom_called()
callers.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: const fix]
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 30 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 6f6a575e77a..025f8abfae2 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -295,6 +295,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p) static struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) { struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL; + + if (!mm) + return NULL; /* * Because we have no locks, mm->owner's may be being moved to other * cgroup. We use css_tryget() here even if this looks @@ -486,10 +489,20 @@ void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page, int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *mem) { int ret; + struct mem_cgroup *curr = NULL; task_lock(task); - ret = task->mm && mm_match_cgroup(task->mm, mem); + rcu_read_lock(); + curr = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(task->mm); + rcu_read_unlock(); task_unlock(task); + if (!curr) + return 0; + if (curr->use_hierarchy) + ret = css_is_ancestor(&curr->css, &mem->css); + else + ret = (curr == mem); + css_put(&curr->css); return ret; } @@ -820,6 +833,19 @@ bool mem_cgroup_oom_called(struct task_struct *task) rcu_read_unlock(); return ret; } + +static int record_last_oom_cb(struct mem_cgroup *mem, void *data) +{ + mem->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies; + return 0; +} + +static void record_last_oom(struct mem_cgroup *mem) +{ + mem_cgroup_walk_tree(mem, NULL, record_last_oom_cb); +} + + /* * Unlike exported interface, "oom" parameter is added. if oom==true, * oom-killer can be invoked. @@ -902,7 +928,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm, mutex_lock(&memcg_tasklist); mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask); mutex_unlock(&memcg_tasklist); - mem_over_limit->last_oom_jiffies = jiffies; + record_last_oom(mem_over_limit); } goto nomem; } |