| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The main tests for PSR1 check if hardware tracking is detecting
changes in planes when modifing it in different ways and now
those tests will also run for PSR2 if supported by source and sink.
v4: Dynamic generating PSR1 and PSR2 tests instead of copy and paste
tests twice.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
When the PSR2 tests were added it will be necessary switch between
PSR versions, so lets add test_setup() and make it call
setup_test_plane() and assert if PSR is active as it is the base for
every test.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
Add the mode parameter to psr_enable() and psr_sink_support() so PSR1
and PSR2 can be tested separated.
For now all PSR tests will run only with PSR1 and the tests for PSR2
will come in the future.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
This way we can test both PSR version separated.
v4: Dropping psr_state_check() to psr_active_check()
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
This is a initial preparation for PSR2 test support, as in PSR2 a
update to screen could mean that PSR is still active and the screen
will be update by a selective update this renamed is necessary.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
The same code checking if sink supports PSR was spread into 3 tests,
better move it to lib and reuse.
v2: splitted previous patch into this one and the next one(Dhinakaran)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
So every function reading i915_edp_psr_status can allocate a buffer
long enough.
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
We want to allow bpp = 8 or 16, so make sure we set the bpp
in igt_buf. This way we can extend rendercopy to support
other values for bpp.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
[mlankhorst: Fix double ;; (Ville]
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
|
|
Simple rule of thumb, if a kms_* test calls igt_display_init() in its
global fixture, skip the entire test if the driver has disabled KMS.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
|
|
PSR appears to not exit immediately after the test commits a page flip,
give some leeway for PSR to idle. Let's set the timeout at 40 ms with a
5 ms interval between each status read.
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
The tests we have work only with PSR1, but setting the module parameter
enable_psr enables PSR2 if the panel supports it. Make use of the newly
added debugfs toggle to enable only PSR1 when testing.
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
The tests calls igt_debugfs_dir() to open the debugfs dir and further
along calls igt_debugfs_read() each time i915_edp_psr_status needs to be
read. As igt_debugfs_read() opens the directory unnecessarily, switch to
using the newly added igt_debugfs_simple_read()
v2: Commit message typo (Jose)
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
|
|
kms_frontbuffer_tracking and kms_psr test PSR in different ways, let'
fix that by creating common library functions.
v2: Include the new file in meson.build
v3: Leave --no-psr intact (Rodrigo)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Change the function arguments to not rely on test specific data as
the following patches change kms_frontbuffer_tracking to reuse PSR
functions.
v2: Leave --no-psr intact (Rodrigo)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
We don't use sink CRC anymore in this test.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
