summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>2017-01-20 15:37:06 -0800
committerBart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>2017-02-08 16:41:19 -0800
commit6de3e933e78b0ac338df05b06a358e399d5b98c9 (patch)
tree9f5b35ce18566ec8dd0d32f493d553c21d93cd02
parent154a6cb4007318077c26f19ed1bfc57155dd65a9 (diff)
target: Avoid that XCOPY commands trigger a deadlock
Move the target_depend_item() call out of the critical section. This patch avoids that lockdep reports the following: ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 4.10.0-rc4-debug+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- rmdir/1799 is trying to acquire lock: (&sess->cmdsn_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa02dc45d>] iscsit_free_all_ooo_cmdsns+0x2d/0xb0 [iscsi_target_mod] but task is already holding lock: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff811c58c0>] vfs_rmdir+0x50/0x140 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){++++++}: [<ffffffff810b4731>] lock_acquire+0x71/0x90 [<ffffffff8167eacf>] down_write+0x3f/0x70 [<ffffffffa025315a>] configfs_depend_item+0x3a/0xb0 [configfs] [<ffffffffa0264053>] target_depend_item+0x13/0x20 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa02891db>] target_xcopy_locate_se_dev_e4+0xdb/0x1a0 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa0289e6c>] target_do_xcopy+0x31c/0x8b0 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa027d9a2>] __target_execute_cmd+0x22/0xa0 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa027e409>] target_execute_cmd.part.20+0x1e9/0x290 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa027e4c3>] target_execute_cmd+0x13/0x20 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa02dc2d2>] iscsit_execute_cmd+0x1d2/0x230 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02e4acb>] iscsit_sequence_cmd+0x10b/0x190 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02eb01d>] iscsit_get_rx_pdu+0x37d/0xcd0 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02ec93e>] iscsi_target_rx_thread+0x6e/0xa0 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffff810828c2>] kthread+0x102/0x140 [<ffffffff81681b21>] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40 -> #1 (g_device_mutex){+.+...}: [<ffffffff810b4731>] lock_acquire+0x71/0x90 [<ffffffff8167c49f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x670 [<ffffffffa0289123>] target_xcopy_locate_se_dev_e4+0x23/0x1a0 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa0289e6c>] target_do_xcopy+0x31c/0x8b0 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa027d9a2>] __target_execute_cmd+0x22/0xa0 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa027e409>] target_execute_cmd.part.20+0x1e9/0x290 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa027e4c3>] target_execute_cmd+0x13/0x20 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa02dc2d2>] iscsit_execute_cmd+0x1d2/0x230 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02e4acb>] iscsit_sequence_cmd+0x10b/0x190 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02eb01d>] iscsit_get_rx_pdu+0x37d/0xcd0 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02ec93e>] iscsi_target_rx_thread+0x6e/0xa0 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffff810828c2>] kthread+0x102/0x140 [<ffffffff81681b21>] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40 -> #0 (&sess->cmdsn_mutex){+.+.+.}: [<ffffffff810b41e6>] __lock_acquire+0x10e6/0x1260 [<ffffffff810b4731>] lock_acquire+0x71/0x90 [<ffffffff8167c49f>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x670 [<ffffffffa02dc45d>] iscsit_free_all_ooo_cmdsns+0x2d/0xb0 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02ecc8c>] iscsit_close_session+0xac/0x200 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02f27af>] lio_tpg_close_session+0x9f/0xb0 [iscsi_target_mod] [<ffffffffa02796f3>] target_shutdown_sessions+0xc3/0xd0 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa0279cf1>] core_tpg_del_initiator_node_acl+0x91/0x140 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa026c8c0>] target_fabric_nacl_base_release+0x20/0x30 [target_core_mod] [<ffffffffa02560ca>] config_item_release+0x5a/0xc0 [configfs] [<ffffffffa025614d>] config_item_put+0x1d/0x1f [configfs] [<ffffffffa02544d6>] configfs_rmdir+0x1a6/0x300 [configfs] [<ffffffff811c5927>] vfs_rmdir+0xb7/0x140 [<ffffffff811cb404>] do_rmdir+0x1f4/0x200 [<ffffffff811cc131>] SyS_rmdir+0x11/0x20 [<ffffffff81681885>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sess->cmdsn_mutex --> g_device_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15); lock(g_device_mutex); lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15); lock(&sess->cmdsn_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by rmdir/1799: #0: (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811e059f>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50 #1: (&default_group_class[depth - 1]#2/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811cb36e>] do_rmdir+0x15e/0x200 #2: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff811c58c0>] vfs_rmdir+0x50/0x140 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 1799 Comm: rmdir Not tainted 4.10.0-rc4-debug+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x86/0xc3 print_circular_bug+0x1c7/0x220 __lock_acquire+0x10e6/0x1260 lock_acquire+0x71/0x90 mutex_lock_nested+0x5f/0x670 iscsit_free_all_ooo_cmdsns+0x2d/0xb0 [iscsi_target_mod] iscsit_close_session+0xac/0x200 [iscsi_target_mod] lio_tpg_close_session+0x9f/0xb0 [iscsi_target_mod] target_shutdown_sessions+0xc3/0xd0 [target_core_mod] core_tpg_del_initiator_node_acl+0x91/0x140 [target_core_mod] target_fabric_nacl_base_release+0x20/0x30 [target_core_mod] config_item_release+0x5a/0xc0 [configfs] config_item_put+0x1d/0x1f [configfs] configfs_rmdir+0x1a6/0x300 [configfs] vfs_rmdir+0xb7/0x140 do_rmdir+0x1f4/0x200 SyS_rmdir+0x11/0x20 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6 Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
-rw-r--r--drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c43
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c b/drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c
index 180d8d718db5..623835371f2f 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_xcopy.c
@@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ static int target_xcopy_locate_se_dev_e4(const unsigned char *dev_wwn,
unsigned char tmp_dev_wwn[XCOPY_NAA_IEEE_REGEX_LEN];
int rc;
+ *found_dev = NULL;
+
mutex_lock(&g_device_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(se_dev, &g_device_list, g_dev_node) {
@@ -69,32 +71,33 @@ static int target_xcopy_locate_se_dev_e4(const unsigned char *dev_wwn,
memset(&tmp_dev_wwn[0], 0, XCOPY_NAA_IEEE_REGEX_LEN);
target_xcopy_gen_naa_ieee(se_dev, &tmp_dev_wwn[0]);
- rc = memcmp(&tmp_dev_wwn[0], dev_wwn, XCOPY_NAA_IEEE_REGEX_LEN);
- if (rc != 0)
+ if (memcmp(&tmp_dev_wwn[0], dev_wwn, XCOPY_NAA_IEEE_REGEX_LEN))
continue;
- *found_dev = se_dev;
- pr_debug("XCOPY 0xe4: located se_dev: %p\n", se_dev);
+ if (target_get_device(se_dev))
+ *found_dev = se_dev;
+ break;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&g_device_mutex);
- rc = target_depend_item(&se_dev->dev_group.cg_item);
- if (rc != 0) {
- pr_err("configfs_depend_item attempt failed:"
- " %d for se_dev: %p\n", rc, se_dev);
- mutex_unlock(&g_device_mutex);
- return rc;
- }
+ if (*found_dev == NULL) {
+ pr_debug_ratelimited("Unable to locate 0xe4 descriptor for EXTENDED_COPY\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
- pr_debug("Called configfs_depend_item for se_dev: %p"
- " se_dev->se_dev_group: %p\n", se_dev,
- &se_dev->dev_group);
+ pr_debug("XCOPY 0xe4: located se_dev: %p\n", se_dev);
- mutex_unlock(&g_device_mutex);
- return 0;
- }
- mutex_unlock(&g_device_mutex);
+ rc = target_depend_item(&se_dev->dev_group.cg_item);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ pr_err("configfs_depend_item attempt failed: %d for se_dev: %p\n",
+ rc, se_dev);
+ else
+ pr_debug("Called configfs_depend_item for se_dev: %p se_dev->se_dev_group: %p\n",
+ se_dev, &se_dev->dev_group);
- pr_debug_ratelimited("Unable to locate 0xe4 descriptor for EXTENDED_COPY\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ target_put_device(se_dev);
+
+ return rc;
}
static int target_xcopy_parse_tiddesc_e4(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, struct xcopy_op *xop,