diff options
author | Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com> | 2022-02-09 12:10:08 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> | 2022-04-06 13:10:34 +0200 |
commit | 81cc3df9a90e7817494421ecc48ede6bd5e8132b (patch) | |
tree | fd88593d7c636ce70ec6fe5dff2cc40294238e71 /arch/x86/boot | |
parent | 0bd6f1e526070271dbe0f626b123b4f6b01dc79c (diff) |
x86/sev: Check the VMPL level
The Virtual Machine Privilege Level (VMPL) feature in the SEV-SNP
architecture allows a guest VM to divide its address space into four
levels. The level can be used to provide hardware isolated abstraction
layers within a VM. VMPL0 is the highest privilege level, and VMPL3 is
the least privilege level. Certain operations must be done by the VMPL0
software, such as:
* Validate or invalidate memory range (PVALIDATE instruction)
* Allocate VMSA page (RMPADJUST instruction when VMSA=1)
The initial SNP support requires that the guest kernel is running at
VMPL0. Add such a check to verify the guest is running at level 0 before
continuing the boot. There is no easy method to query the current VMPL
level, so use the RMPADJUST instruction to determine whether the guest
is running at the VMPL0.
[ bp: Massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220307213356.2797205-15-brijesh.singh@amd.com
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/boot')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c | 28 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c index 5b389310be87..eb421787d50a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c @@ -199,6 +199,26 @@ finish: sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SEV_ES_GEN_REQ); } +static void enforce_vmpl0(void) +{ + u64 attrs; + int err; + + /* + * RMPADJUST modifies RMP permissions of a lesser-privileged (numerically + * higher) privilege level. Here, clear the VMPL1 permission mask of the + * GHCB page. If the guest is not running at VMPL0, this will fail. + * + * If the guest is running at VMPL0, it will succeed. Even if that operation + * modifies permission bits, it is still ok to do so currently because Linux + * SNP guests are supported only on VMPL0 so VMPL1 or higher permission masks + * changing is a don't-care. + */ + attrs = 1; + if (rmpadjust((unsigned long)&boot_ghcb_page, RMP_PG_SIZE_4K, attrs)) + sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX, GHCB_TERM_NOT_VMPL0); +} + void sev_enable(struct boot_params *bp) { unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx; @@ -242,8 +262,12 @@ void sev_enable(struct boot_params *bp) * SNP is supported in v2 of the GHCB spec which mandates support for HV * features. */ - if (sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED && !(get_hv_features() & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP)) - sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SNP_UNSUPPORTED); + if (sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED) { + if (!(get_hv_features() & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP)) + sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SNP_UNSUPPORTED); + + enforce_vmpl0(); + } sme_me_mask = BIT_ULL(ebx & 0x3f); } |