diff options
author | Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> | 2009-12-21 14:37:26 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-12-22 14:17:55 -0800 |
commit | 45465487897a1c6d508b14b904dc5777f7ec7e04 (patch) | |
tree | 935c8dae68dc793ff2f795d57cf027531475cd53 /drivers/char/nozomi.c | |
parent | 2ec91eec47f713e3d158ba5b28a24a85a2cf3650 (diff) |
kfifo: move struct kfifo in place
This is a new generic kernel FIFO implementation.
The current kernel fifo API is not very widely used, because it has to
many constrains. Only 17 files in the current 2.6.31-rc5 used it.
FIFO's are like list's a very basic thing and a kfifo API which handles
the most use case would save a lot of development time and memory
resources.
I think this are the reasons why kfifo is not in use:
- The API is to simple, important functions are missing
- A fifo can be only allocated dynamically
- There is a requirement of a spinlock whether you need it or not
- There is no support for data records inside a fifo
So I decided to extend the kfifo in a more generic way without blowing up
the API to much. The new API has the following benefits:
- Generic usage: For kernel internal use and/or device driver.
- Provide an API for the most use case.
- Slim API: The whole API provides 25 functions.
- Linux style habit.
- DECLARE_KFIFO, DEFINE_KFIFO and INIT_KFIFO Macros
- Direct copy_to_user from the fifo and copy_from_user into the fifo.
- The kfifo itself is an in place member of the using data structure, this save an
indirection access and does not waste the kernel allocator.
- Lockless access: if only one reader and one writer is active on the fifo,
which is the common use case, no additional locking is necessary.
- Remove spinlock - give the user the freedom of choice what kind of locking to use if
one is required.
- Ability to handle records. Three type of records are supported:
- Variable length records between 0-255 bytes, with a record size
field of 1 bytes.
- Variable length records between 0-65535 bytes, with a record size
field of 2 bytes.
- Fixed size records, which no record size field.
- Preserve memory resource.
- Performance!
- Easy to use!
This patch:
Since most users want to have the kfifo as part of another object,
reorganize the code to allow including struct kfifo in another data
structure. This requires changing the kfifo_alloc and kfifo_init
prototypes so that we pass an existing kfifo pointer into them. This
patch changes the implementation and all existing users.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warning]
Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/char/nozomi.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/char/nozomi.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/char/nozomi.c b/drivers/char/nozomi.c index d3400b20444f..0f39bec28b45 100644 --- a/drivers/char/nozomi.c +++ b/drivers/char/nozomi.c @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ struct port { u8 update_flow_control; struct ctrl_ul ctrl_ul; struct ctrl_dl ctrl_dl; - struct kfifo *fifo_ul; + struct kfifo fifo_ul; void __iomem *dl_addr[2]; u32 dl_size[2]; u8 toggle_dl; @@ -685,8 +685,8 @@ static int nozomi_read_config_table(struct nozomi *dc) dump_table(dc); for (i = PORT_MDM; i < MAX_PORT; i++) { - dc->port[i].fifo_ul = - kfifo_alloc(FIFO_BUFFER_SIZE_UL, GFP_ATOMIC, NULL); + kfifo_alloc(&dc->port[i].fifo_ul, + FIFO_BUFFER_SIZE_UL, GFP_ATOMIC, NULL); memset(&dc->port[i].ctrl_dl, 0, sizeof(struct ctrl_dl)); memset(&dc->port[i].ctrl_ul, 0, sizeof(struct ctrl_ul)); } @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static int send_data(enum port_type index, struct nozomi *dc) struct tty_struct *tty = tty_port_tty_get(&port->port); /* Get data from tty and place in buf for now */ - size = __kfifo_get(port->fifo_ul, dc->send_buf, + size = __kfifo_get(&port->fifo_ul, dc->send_buf, ul_size < SEND_BUF_MAX ? ul_size : SEND_BUF_MAX); if (size == 0) { @@ -988,11 +988,11 @@ static int receive_flow_control(struct nozomi *dc) } else if (old_ctrl.CTS == 0 && ctrl_dl.CTS == 1) { - if (__kfifo_len(dc->port[port].fifo_ul)) { + if (__kfifo_len(&dc->port[port].fifo_ul)) { DBG1("Enable interrupt (0x%04X) on port: %d", enable_ier, port); DBG1("Data in buffer [%d], enable transmit! ", - __kfifo_len(dc->port[port].fifo_ul)); + __kfifo_len(&dc->port[port].fifo_ul)); enable_transmit_ul(port, dc); } else { DBG1("No data in buffer..."); @@ -1536,8 +1536,7 @@ static void __devexit nozomi_card_exit(struct pci_dev *pdev) free_irq(pdev->irq, dc); for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORT; i++) - if (dc->port[i].fifo_ul) - kfifo_free(dc->port[i].fifo_ul); + kfifo_free(&dc->port[i].fifo_ul); kfree(dc->send_buf); @@ -1673,7 +1672,7 @@ static int ntty_write(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *buffer, goto exit; } - rval = __kfifo_put(port->fifo_ul, (unsigned char *)buffer, count); + rval = __kfifo_put(&port->fifo_ul, (unsigned char *)buffer, count); /* notify card */ if (unlikely(dc == NULL)) { @@ -1721,7 +1720,7 @@ static int ntty_write_room(struct tty_struct *tty) if (!port->port.count) goto exit; - room = port->fifo_ul->size - __kfifo_len(port->fifo_ul); + room = port->fifo_ul.size - __kfifo_len(&port->fifo_ul); exit: mutex_unlock(&port->tty_sem); @@ -1878,7 +1877,7 @@ static s32 ntty_chars_in_buffer(struct tty_struct *tty) goto exit_in_buffer; } - rval = __kfifo_len(port->fifo_ul); + rval = __kfifo_len(&port->fifo_ul); exit_in_buffer: return rval; |