diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> | 2020-10-07 11:08:08 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> | 2020-10-09 14:43:30 -0400 |
commit | 89c785bb1a7310fa18d0e32af3a6bc9947c348fe (patch) | |
tree | 1bf3dea926a8cc50c41117b00c4457f7966f5b57 /drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c | |
parent | aa8d10a10fd78443a647983cc5e4c233bbe2c963 (diff) |
drm/amd/pm: Replace one-element array with flexible-array in struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.
Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->numEntries by sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_table)
when it should have been multiplied it by
sizeof(struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_record) instead.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d3a.ryM4GmZr3e0JeZy+%25lkp@intel.com/
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions