Merge branch 'bpf-trampoline'

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
Introduce BPF trampoline that works as a bridge between kernel functions, BPF
programs and other BPF programs.

The first use case is fentry/fexit BPF programs that are roughly equivalent to
kprobe/kretprobe. Unlike k[ret]probe there is practically zero overhead to call
a set of BPF programs before or after kernel function.

The second use case is heavily influenced by pain points in XDP development.
BPF trampoline allows attaching similar fentry/fexit BPF program to any
networking BPF program. It's now possible to see packets on input and output of
any XDP, TC, lwt, cgroup programs without disturbing them. This greatly helps
BPF-based network troubleshooting.

The third use case of BPF trampoline will be explored in the follow up patches.
The BPF trampoline will be used to dynamicly link BPF programs. It's more
generic mechanism than array and link list of programs used in tracing,
networking, cgroups. In many cases it can be used as a replacement for
bpf_tail_call-based program chaining. See [1] for long term design discussion.

v3 -> v4:
- Included Peter's
  "86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate instructions" as a first patch.
  If it changes between now and merge window, I'll rebease to newer version.
  The patch is necessary to do s/text_poke/text_poke_bp/ in patch 3 to fix the race.
- In patch 4 fixed bpf_trampoline creation race spotted by Andrii.
- Added patch 15 that annotates prog->kern bpf context types. It made patches 16
  and 17 cleaner and more generic.
- Addressed Andrii's feedback in other patches.

v2 -> v3:
- Addressed Song's and Andrii's comments
- Fixed few minor bugs discovered while testing
- Added one more libbpf patch

v1 -> v2:
- Addressed Andrii's comments
- Added more test for fentry/fexit to kernel functions. Including stress test
  for maximum number of progs per trampoline.
- Fixed a race btf_resolve_helper_id()
- Added a patch to compare BTF types of functions arguments with actual types.
- Added support for attaching BPF program to another BPF program via trampoline
- Converted to use text_poke() API. That's the only viable mechanism to
  implement BPF-to-BPF attach. BPF-to-kernel attach can be refactored to use
  register_ftrace_direct() whenever it's available.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191112025112.bhzmrrh2pr76ssnh@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com/
====================

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

1 files changed, 67 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 6d9ce95e5a8d..c88c815c2154 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(map_idr_lock);
 int sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled __read_mostly;
 
 static const struct bpf_map_ops * const bpf_map_types[] = {
-#define BPF_PROG_TYPE(_id, _ops)
+#define BPF_PROG_TYPE(_id, _name, prog_ctx_type, kern_ctx_type)
 #define BPF_MAP_TYPE(_id, _ops) \
 	[_id] = &_ops,
 #include <linux/bpf_types.h>
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ err_put:
 }
 
 static const struct bpf_prog_ops * const bpf_prog_types[] = {
-#define BPF_PROG_TYPE(_id, _name) \
+#define BPF_PROG_TYPE(_id, _name, prog_ctx_type, kern_ctx_type) \
 	[_id] = & _name ## _prog_ops,
 #define BPF_MAP_TYPE(_id, _ops)
 #include <linux/bpf_types.h>
@@ -1328,6 +1328,7 @@ static void __bpf_prog_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
 	struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = container_of(rcu, struct bpf_prog_aux, rcu);
 
 	kvfree(aux->func_info);
+	kfree(aux->func_info_aux);
 	free_used_maps(aux);
 	bpf_prog_uncharge_memlock(aux->prog);
 	security_bpf_prog_free(aux);
@@ -1576,7 +1577,7 @@ static void bpf_prog_load_fixup_attach_type(union bpf_attr *attr)
 static int
 bpf_prog_load_check_attach(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 			   enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type,
-			   u32 btf_id)
+			   u32 btf_id, u32 prog_fd)
 {
 	switch (prog_type) {
 	case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
@@ -1584,7 +1585,7 @@ bpf_prog_load_check_attach(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 			return -EINVAL;
 		break;
 	default:
-		if (btf_id)
+		if (btf_id || prog_fd)
 			return -EINVAL;
 		break;
 	}
@@ -1635,7 +1636,7 @@ bpf_prog_load_check_attach(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
 }
 
 /* last field in 'union bpf_attr' used by this command */
-#define	BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD attach_btf_id
+#define	BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD attach_prog_fd
 
 static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
@@ -1678,7 +1679,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 
 	bpf_prog_load_fixup_attach_type(attr);
 	if (bpf_prog_load_check_attach(type, attr->expected_attach_type,
-				       attr->attach_btf_id))
+				       attr->attach_btf_id,
+				       attr->attach_prog_fd))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* plain bpf_prog allocation */
@@ -1688,6 +1690,16 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 
 	prog->expected_attach_type = attr->expected_attach_type;
 	prog->aux->attach_btf_id = attr->attach_btf_id;
+	if (attr->attach_prog_fd) {
+		struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog;
+
+		tgt_prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->attach_prog_fd);
+		if (IS_ERR(tgt_prog)) {
+			err = PTR_ERR(tgt_prog);
+			goto free_prog_nouncharge;
+		}
+		prog->aux->linked_prog = tgt_prog;
+	}
 
 	prog->aux->offload_requested = !!attr->prog_ifindex;
 
@@ -1799,6 +1811,49 @@ static int bpf_obj_get(const union bpf_attr *attr)
 				attr->file_flags);
 }
 
+static int bpf_tracing_prog_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog *prog = filp->private_data;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(prog));
+	bpf_prog_put(prog);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations bpf_tracing_prog_fops = {
+	.release	= bpf_tracing_prog_release,
+	.read		= bpf_dummy_read,
+	.write		= bpf_dummy_write,
+};
+
+static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	int tr_fd, err;
+
+	if (prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_FENTRY &&
+	    prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_FEXIT) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_put_prog;
+	}
+
+	err = bpf_trampoline_link_prog(prog);
+	if (err)
+		goto out_put_prog;
+
+	tr_fd = anon_inode_getfd("bpf-tracing-prog", &bpf_tracing_prog_fops,
+				 prog, O_CLOEXEC);
+	if (tr_fd < 0) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(prog));
+		err = tr_fd;
+		goto out_put_prog;
+	}
+	return tr_fd;
+
+out_put_prog:
+	bpf_prog_put(prog);
+	return err;
+}
+
 struct bpf_raw_tracepoint {
 	struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp;
 	struct bpf_prog *prog;
@@ -1850,14 +1905,16 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
 
 	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
 		if (attr->raw_tracepoint.name) {
-			/* raw_tp name should not be specified in raw_tp
-			 * programs that were verified via in-kernel BTF info
+			/* The attach point for this category of programs
+			 * should be specified via btf_id during program load.
 			 */
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_put_prog;
 		}
-		/* raw_tp name is taken from type name instead */
-		tp_name = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
+		if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
+			tp_name = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
+		else
+			return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog);
 	} else {
 		if (strncpy_from_user(buf,
 				      u64_to_user_ptr(attr->raw_tracepoint.name),