Merge series "spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use gpio descriptors for CS" from Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>:

Collected patches from the two series below and associated tags so they
can be merged in one pile through the spi tree. Merry December!

SPI: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202214935.1114381-1-swboyd@chromium.org
cros-ec: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203011649.1405292-1-swboyd@chromium.org

Cc: Akash Asthana <akashast@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>

Stephen Boyd (3):
  platform/chrome: cros_ec_spi: Don't overwrite spi::mode
  platform/chrome: cros_ec_spi: Drop bits_per_word assignment
  spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use the new method of gpio CS control

 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c | 2 --
 drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c           | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

base-commit: b65054597872ce3aefbc6a666385eabdf9e288da
--
https://chromeos.dev

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 25 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 3e99dfef8408..c1418b47f625 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline bool lockdep_enabled(void)
 	if (!debug_locks)
 		return false;
 
-	if (raw_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion))
+	if (this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion))
 		return false;
 
 	if (current->lockdep_recursion)
@@ -108,19 +108,21 @@ static inline void lockdep_lock(void)
 {
 	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
 
+	__this_cpu_inc(lockdep_recursion);
 	arch_spin_lock(&__lock);
 	__owner = current;
-	__this_cpu_inc(lockdep_recursion);
 }
 
 static inline void lockdep_unlock(void)
 {
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
+
 	if (debug_locks && DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner != current))
 		return;
 
-	__this_cpu_dec(lockdep_recursion);
 	__owner = NULL;
 	arch_spin_unlock(&__lock);
+	__this_cpu_dec(lockdep_recursion);
 }
 
 static inline bool lockdep_assert_locked(void)
@@ -2765,7 +2767,9 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
  * (Note that this has to be done separately, because the graph cannot
  * detect such classes of deadlocks.)
  *
- * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
+ * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 if another lock with the same
+ * lock class is held but nest_lock is also held, i.e. we rely on the
+ * nest_lock to avoid the deadlock.
  */
 static int
 check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
@@ -2788,7 +2792,7 @@ check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
 		 * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
 		 */
 		if ((next->read == 2) && prev->read)
-			return 2;
+			continue;
 
 		/*
 		 * We're holding the nest_lock, which serializes this lock's
@@ -3593,15 +3597,12 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
 		if (!ret)
 			return 0;
 		/*
-		 * Mark recursive read, as we jump over it when
-		 * building dependencies (just like we jump over
-		 * trylock entries):
-		 */
-		if (ret == 2)
-			hlock->read = 2;
-		/*
 		 * Add dependency only if this lock is not the head
-		 * of the chain, and if it's not a secondary read-lock:
+		 * of the chain, and if the new lock introduces no more
+		 * lock dependency (because we already hold a lock with the
+		 * same lock class) nor deadlock (because the nest_lock
+		 * serializes nesting locks), see the comments for
+		 * check_deadlock().
 		 */
 		if (!chain_head && ret != 2) {
 			if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock))
@@ -4057,7 +4058,7 @@ void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
 	if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
 		return;
 
-	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
+	if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
 		return;
 
 	if (unlikely(lockdep_hardirqs_enabled())) {
@@ -4126,7 +4127,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
 		goto skip_checks;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
+	if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(lockdep_recursion)))
 		return;
 
 	if (lockdep_hardirqs_enabled()) {
@@ -4396,6 +4397,9 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 	if (unlikely(hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & new_mask))
 		goto unlock;
 
+	if (!hlock_class(this)->usage_mask)
+		debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
+
 	hlock_class(this)->usage_mask |= new_mask;
 
 	if (new_bit < LOCK_TRACE_STATES) {
@@ -4403,19 +4407,10 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
 			return 0;
 	}
 
-	switch (new_bit) {
-	case 0 ... LOCK_USED-1:
+	if (new_bit < LOCK_USED) {
 		ret = mark_lock_irq(curr, this, new_bit);
 		if (!ret)
 			return 0;
-		break;
-
-	case LOCK_USED:
-		debug_atomic_dec(nr_unused_locks);
-		break;
-
-	default:
-		break;
 	}
 
 unlock: