Merge series "spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use gpio descriptors for CS" from Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>:

Collected patches from the two series below and associated tags so they
can be merged in one pile through the spi tree. Merry December!

SPI: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202214935.1114381-1-swboyd@chromium.org
cros-ec: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201203011649.1405292-1-swboyd@chromium.org

Cc: Akash Asthana <akashast@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexandru M Stan <amstan@chromium.org>

Stephen Boyd (3):
  platform/chrome: cros_ec_spi: Don't overwrite spi::mode
  platform/chrome: cros_ec_spi: Drop bits_per_word assignment
  spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use the new method of gpio CS control

 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_spi.c | 2 --
 drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c           | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

base-commit: b65054597872ce3aefbc6a666385eabdf9e288da
--
https://chromeos.dev

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index e254745a82cb..97d318b0cd0c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -102,8 +102,12 @@ static bool sugov_should_update_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time)
 static bool sugov_update_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
 				   unsigned int next_freq)
 {
-	if (sg_policy->next_freq == next_freq)
-		return false;
+	if (!sg_policy->need_freq_update) {
+		if (sg_policy->next_freq == next_freq)
+			return false;
+	} else {
+		sg_policy->need_freq_update = cpufreq_driver_test_flags(CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS);
+	}
 
 	sg_policy->next_freq = next_freq;
 	sg_policy->last_freq_update_time = time;
@@ -164,7 +168,6 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
 	if (freq == sg_policy->cached_raw_freq && !sg_policy->need_freq_update)
 		return sg_policy->next_freq;
 
-	sg_policy->need_freq_update = false;
 	sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = freq;
 	return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq);
 }
@@ -440,7 +443,6 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
 	unsigned long util, max;
 	unsigned int next_f;
-	bool busy;
 	unsigned int cached_freq = sg_policy->cached_raw_freq;
 
 	sugov_iowait_boost(sg_cpu, time, flags);
@@ -451,9 +453,6 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 	if (!sugov_should_update_freq(sg_policy, time))
 		return;
 
-	/* Limits may have changed, don't skip frequency update */
-	busy = !sg_policy->need_freq_update && sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
-
 	util = sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
 	max = sg_cpu->max;
 	util = sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, util, max);
@@ -462,7 +461,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 	 * Do not reduce the frequency if the CPU has not been idle
 	 * recently, as the reduction is likely to be premature then.
 	 */
-	if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq) {
+	if (sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu) && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq) {
 		next_f = sg_policy->next_freq;
 
 		/* Restore cached freq as next_freq has changed */
@@ -827,9 +826,10 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	sg_policy->next_freq			= 0;
 	sg_policy->work_in_progress		= false;
 	sg_policy->limits_changed		= false;
-	sg_policy->need_freq_update		= false;
 	sg_policy->cached_raw_freq		= 0;
 
+	sg_policy->need_freq_update = cpufreq_driver_test_flags(CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS);
+
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {
 		struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, cpu);
 
@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static void sugov_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 struct cpufreq_governor schedutil_gov = {
 	.name			= "schedutil",
 	.owner			= THIS_MODULE,
-	.dynamic_switching	= true,
+	.flags			= CPUFREQ_GOV_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING,
 	.init			= sugov_init,
 	.exit			= sugov_exit,
 	.start			= sugov_start,