summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/mod
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2022-03-25 11:48:01 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2022-03-25 11:48:01 -0700
commit50560ce6a0bdab2fc37384c52aa02c7043909d2c (patch)
tree5f44ce74ab1a189f26bdd2d2d9a1537985b0cc19 /scripts/mod
parent29c8c18363eee546d19bd95daa1e33c64ee74414 (diff)
parent1e24078113ae69c741cb1b03375a9f1490db7308 (diff)
Merge tag 'kbuild-gnu11-v5.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild
Pull Kbuild update for C11 language base from Masahiro Yamada: "Kbuild -std=gnu11 updates for v5.18 Linus pointed out the benefits of C99 some years ago, especially variable declarations in loops [1]. At that time, we were not ready for the migration due to old compilers. Recently, Jakob Koschel reported a bug in list_for_each_entry(), which leaks the invalid pointer out of the loop [2]. In the discussion, we agreed that the time had come. Now that GCC 5.1 is the minimum compiler version, there is nothing to prevent us from going to -std=gnu99, or even straight to -std=gnu11. Discussions for a better list iterator implementation are ongoing, but this patch set must land first" [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgr12JkKmRd21qh-se-_Gs69kbPgR9x4C+Es-yJV2GLkA@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/86C4CE7D-6D93-456B-AA82-F8ADEACA40B7@gmail.com/ * tag 'kbuild-gnu11-v5.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild: Kbuild: use -std=gnu11 for KBUILD_USERCFLAGS Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11 Kbuild: use -Wdeclaration-after-statement Kbuild: add -Wno-shift-negative-value where -Wextra is used
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/mod')
-rw-r--r--scripts/mod/modpost.c4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
index dbc0aaf69e43..8a7937452991 100644
--- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
+++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
@@ -838,8 +838,10 @@ static int match(const char *sym, const char * const pat[])
{
const char *p;
while (*pat) {
+ const char *endp;
+
p = *pat++;
- const char *endp = p + strlen(p) - 1;
+ endp = p + strlen(p) - 1;
/* "*foo*" */
if (*p == '*' && *endp == '*') {