diff options
author | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2021-02-05 17:20:14 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2021-02-10 01:31:45 +0100 |
commit | ee114dd64c0071500345439fc79dd5e0f9d106ed (patch) | |
tree | 32a6a5f19f508c60da0e9eaef0d419c26bdf2063 /tools/perf/scripts/python/stackcollapse.py | |
parent | 6183f4d3a0a2ad230511987c6c362ca43ec0055f (diff) |
bpf: Fix verifier jsgt branch analysis on max bound
Fix incorrect is_branch{32,64}_taken() analysis for the jsgt case. The return
code for both will tell the caller whether a given conditional jump is taken
or not, e.g. 1 means branch will be taken [for the involved registers] and the
goto target will be executed, 0 means branch will not be taken and instead we
fall-through to the next insn, and last but not least a -1 denotes that it is
not known at verification time whether a branch will be taken or not. Now while
the jsgt has the branch-taken case correct with reg->s32_min_value > sval, the
branch-not-taken case is off-by-one when testing for reg->s32_max_value < sval
since the branch will also be taken for reg->s32_max_value == sval. The jgt
branch analysis, for example, gets this right.
Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
Fixes: 4f7b3e82589e ("bpf: improve verifier branch analysis")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/stackcollapse.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions