diff options
| author | Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> | 2022-03-21 19:51:02 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> | 2022-03-22 11:09:24 +0100 |
| commit | f70f5f1a8ffff4c943182aa80c600aeec1b9b001 (patch) | |
| tree | 123fd2a17684dd77da89f6320e3377f642cf92da /tools/perf/scripts/python | |
| parent | 917b149ac3d5c8b3a582559b9779ee29d69fad78 (diff) | |
selftests: forwarding: Use same VRF for port and VLAN upper
The test creates a separate VRF for the VLAN upper, but does not destroy
it during cleanup, resulting in "RTNETLINK answers: File exists" errors.
Fix by using the same VRF for the port and its VLAN upper. This is OK
since their IP addresses do not overlap.
Before:
# ./bridge_locked_port.sh
TEST: Locked port ipv4 [ OK ]
TEST: Locked port ipv6 [ OK ]
TEST: Locked port vlan [ OK ]
# ./bridge_locked_port.sh
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
TEST: Locked port ipv4 [ OK ]
TEST: Locked port ipv6 [ OK ]
TEST: Locked port vlan [ OK ]
After:
# ./bridge_locked_port.sh
TEST: Locked port ipv4 [ OK ]
TEST: Locked port ipv6 [ OK ]
TEST: Locked port vlan [ OK ]
# ./bridge_locked_port.sh
TEST: Locked port ipv4 [ OK ]
TEST: Locked port ipv6 [ OK ]
TEST: Locked port vlan [ OK ]
Fixes: b2b681a41251 ("selftests: forwarding: tests of locked port feature")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions