diff options
author | Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com> | 2016-08-30 23:29:51 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2016-09-07 19:34:28 +0200 |
commit | 3706feacd007c89f49bdb20c5c1dd17c8badfc43 (patch) | |
tree | a719e04c4f1871e8271eb3d2091cef727a3288db /virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | |
parent | f15a75eedc18e1fece8e01f1a6f7d135e61b0750 (diff) |
KVM: Remove deprecated create_singlethread_workqueue
The workqueue "irqfd_cleanup_wq" queues a single work item
&irqfd->shutdown and hence doesn't require ordering. It is a host-wide
workqueue for issuing deferred shutdown requests aggregated from all
vm* instances. It is not being used on a memory reclaim path.
Hence, it has been converted to use system_wq.
The work item has been flushed in kvm_irqfd_release().
The workqueue "wqueue" queues a single work item &timer->expired
and hence doesn't require ordering. Also, it is not being used on
a memory reclaim path. Hence, it has been converted to use system_wq.
System workqueues have been able to handle high level of concurrency
for a long time now and hence it's not required to have a singlethreaded
workqueue just to gain concurrency. Unlike a dedicated per-cpu workqueue
created with create_singlethread_workqueue(), system_wq allows multiple
work items to overlap executions even on the same CPU; however, a
per-cpu workqueue doesn't have any CPU locality or global ordering
guarantee unless the target CPU is explicitly specified and thus the
increase of local concurrency shouldn't make any difference.
Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt/kvm/kvm_main.c')
-rw-r--r-- | virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 195078225aa5..b3fa12ce1166 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -3807,12 +3807,7 @@ int kvm_init(void *opaque, unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align, * kvm_arch_init makes sure there's at most one caller * for architectures that support multiple implementations, * like intel and amd on x86. - * kvm_arch_init must be called before kvm_irqfd_init to avoid creating - * conflicts in case kvm is already setup for another implementation. */ - r = kvm_irqfd_init(); - if (r) - goto out_irqfd; if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpus_hardware_enabled, GFP_KERNEL)) { r = -ENOMEM; @@ -3894,7 +3889,6 @@ out_free_0a: free_cpumask_var(cpus_hardware_enabled); out_free_0: kvm_irqfd_exit(); -out_irqfd: kvm_arch_exit(); out_fail: return r; |