summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/swap.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>2011-01-13 15:47:34 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2011-01-13 17:32:50 -0800
commit744ed1442757767ffede5008bb13e0805085902e (patch)
tree75af93524570b40056f2367059dfa84ba7d90186 /mm/swap.c
parentd8505dee1a87b8d41b9c4ee1325cd72258226fbc (diff)
mm: batch activate_page() to reduce lock contention
The zone->lru_lock is heavily contented in workload where activate_page() is frequently used. We could do batch activate_page() to reduce the lock contention. The batched pages will be added into zone list when the pool is full or page reclaim is trying to drain them. For example, in a 4 socket 64 CPU system, create a sparse file and 64 processes, processes shared map to the file. Each process read access the whole file and then exit. The process exit will do unmap_vmas() and cause a lot of activate_page() call. In such workload, we saw about 58% total time reduction with below patch. Other workloads with a lot of activate_page also benefits a lot too. I tested some microbenchmarks: case-anon-cow-rand-mt 0.58% case-anon-cow-rand -3.30% case-anon-cow-seq-mt -0.51% case-anon-cow-seq -5.68% case-anon-r-rand-mt 0.23% case-anon-r-rand 0.81% case-anon-r-seq-mt -0.71% case-anon-r-seq -1.99% case-anon-rx-rand-mt 2.11% case-anon-rx-seq-mt 3.46% case-anon-w-rand-mt -0.03% case-anon-w-rand -0.50% case-anon-w-seq-mt -1.08% case-anon-w-seq -0.12% case-anon-wx-rand-mt -5.02% case-anon-wx-seq-mt -1.43% case-fork 1.65% case-fork-sleep -0.07% case-fork-withmem 1.39% case-hugetlb -0.59% case-lru-file-mmap-read-mt -0.54% case-lru-file-mmap-read 0.61% case-lru-file-mmap-read-rand -2.24% case-lru-file-readonce -0.64% case-lru-file-readtwice -11.69% case-lru-memcg -1.35% case-mmap-pread-rand-mt 1.88% case-mmap-pread-rand -15.26% case-mmap-pread-seq-mt 0.89% case-mmap-pread-seq -69.72% case-mmap-xread-rand-mt 0.71% case-mmap-xread-seq-mt 0.38% The most significent are: case-lru-file-readtwice -11.69% case-mmap-pread-rand -15.26% case-mmap-pread-seq -69.72% which use activate_page a lot. others are basically variations because each run has slightly difference. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/swap.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/swap.c90
1 files changed, 79 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index ab498ea04ae..bbc1ce9f946 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -271,27 +271,94 @@ static void update_page_reclaim_stat(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
}
/*
- * FIXME: speed this up?
+ * A page will go to active list either by activate_page or putback_lru_page.
+ * In the activate_page case, the page hasn't active bit set. The page might
+ * not in LRU list because it's isolated before it gets a chance to be moved to
+ * active list. The window is small because pagevec just stores several pages.
+ * For such case, we do nothing for such page.
+ * In the putback_lru_page case, the page isn't in lru list but has active
+ * bit set
*/
-void activate_page(struct page *page)
+static void __activate_page(struct page *page, void *arg)
{
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
+ int file = page_is_file_cache(page);
+ int lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
+ bool putback = !PageLRU(page);
- spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
- if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
- int file = page_is_file_cache(page);
- int lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
+ /* The page is isolated before it's moved to active list */
+ if (!PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page))
+ return;
+ if ((PageLRU(page) && PageActive(page)) || PageUnevictable(page))
+ return;
+
+ if (!putback)
del_page_from_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
+ else
+ SetPageLRU(page);
- SetPageActive(page);
- lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
- add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
- __count_vm_event(PGACTIVATE);
+ SetPageActive(page);
+ lru += LRU_ACTIVE;
+ add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru);
+
+ if (putback)
+ return;
+ __count_vm_event(PGACTIVATE);
+ update_page_reclaim_stat(zone, page, file, 1);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pagevec, activate_page_pvecs);
+
+static void activate_page_drain(int cpu)
+{
+ struct pagevec *pvec = &per_cpu(activate_page_pvecs, cpu);
+
+ if (pagevec_count(pvec))
+ pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __activate_page, NULL);
+}
+
+void activate_page(struct page *page)
+{
+ if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
+ struct pagevec *pvec = &get_cpu_var(activate_page_pvecs);
+
+ page_cache_get(page);
+ if (!pagevec_add(pvec, page))
+ pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __activate_page, NULL);
+ put_cpu_var(activate_page_pvecs);
+ }
+}
- update_page_reclaim_stat(zone, page, file, 1);
+/* Caller should hold zone->lru_lock */
+int putback_active_lru_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page)
+{
+ struct pagevec *pvec = &get_cpu_var(activate_page_pvecs);
+
+ if (!pagevec_add(pvec, page)) {
+ spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
+ pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __activate_page, NULL);
+ spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
}
+ put_cpu_var(activate_page_pvecs);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+#else
+static inline void activate_page_drain(int cpu)
+{
+}
+
+void activate_page(struct page *page)
+{
+ struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
+ if (PageLRU(page) && !PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page))
+ __activate_page(page, NULL);
spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
}
+#endif
/*
* Mark a page as having seen activity.
@@ -390,6 +457,7 @@ static void drain_cpu_pagevecs(int cpu)
pagevec_move_tail(pvec);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
+ activate_page_drain(cpu);
}
void lru_add_drain(void)